The subsequent great peripherals war has been waged over your ears. After every company in the world put out a gaming mouse and then a mechanical keyboard, now it’s time for headsets. So gaming headsets.
We realize you don’t wish to scroll through every single headset review when all you want is a straightforward answer: “What’s the most effective gaming headset I could buy with my hard-earned dollars?” This site holds the answer you seek, irrespective of what your budget is.
We’ll keep updating our recommendations when we examine new releases and find stronger contenders. For this latest update, we’ve reviewed a few fancypants models, namely the Sennheiser Game Zero and and Sennheiser GSP 350, and the Audio-Technica ATH-AG1X. To get more earthly budgets, we’ve also tested the SteelSeries Arctis 7, the HyperX Cloud Revolver S, and the Logitech G533, which debuts as our new best mid-range wireless headset.
Kingston doesn’t have the identical pedigree in the headset space as its competitors, however the HyperX Cloud is actually a winning device with a cheap price.
Our 2016 headset recommendation remains pretty much exactly like our 2015 headset recommendation (and our 2014, as an example): The Kingston HyperX Cloud. Or, if you’re feeling a little fancier, the Cloud II. It’s comfortable, it may sound great, and (best of all) it’s comparatively cheap. What else can you want within a headset?
True to its name, the HyperX Cloud is one of the most comfortable headsets on the market. It’s hefty, with a solid-metal construction that belies its cheap price, but sits feather-light around the head. The faux-leather earpieces are generously padded, oversized, and form an effective seal without squeezing too hard.
Plus it sounds excellent. As I said in your review, this isn’t a studio-quality list of headphones. It’s got the normal gaming-centric bass boost plus a slick top quality, but they are both subtle enough that the HyperX Cloud competes favorably with bluetooth headset twice its price. There’s no Kingston-provided way to adjust the sound, given that the HyperX Cloud connects through standard 3.5mm jacks, however you honestly shouldn’t need to tweak it in any way out of your box. It may sound pretty damn great.
Really the only downside is the microphone. It’s very flexible, which I appreciate, but has a propensity to grab background noise and plosives while leaving your voice nasally and hollow.
The slightly-more-expensive HyperX Cloud II is, I do believe, more a lateral move than an improvement over its predecessor. It swaps the 3.5mm connection for a 7.1-ready USB soundcard with better in-line controls and a certain amount of noise cancellation around the microphone, however, you wouldn’t notice an enormous difference between the 2 iterations and I’m unsure the rise in cost is worth it.
Regardless, either model is a wonderful option for a gaming headset. In an increasingly crowded market, the HyperX Cloud nails just about every major category with few significant compromises. I am hoping the next model improves around the microphone, however for $80 it’s a steal.
The Cloud Stinger provides solid sound, serious comfort, as well as an attractive design for everyone who just demands a “good enough” headset without having wallet-shock.
HyperX’s Cloud headset remains our favorite, however the company undercut themselves a little bit by releasing the HyperX Cloud Stinger. Listed at $50, it’s among the cheapest gaming headsets I’ve ever seen coming from a reputable brand. And it’s good.
Sure, it’s not quite as good as the initial Cloud, but for many individuals the Stinger should do all right. The plastic chassis lacks some of the original Cloud’s panache and durability, but looks high-end from a distance and sits pretty slim around the head. HyperX also solved the Cloud’s biggest issue and finally put a volume slider straight at the base in the right earcup and gave it a flip-to-mute microphone, so no longer fiddling with in-line controls.
With regards to audio, the Cloud Stinger’s got a solid mid-range with little to no distortion even at high volumes. The treble is a bit underpowered as well as the bass range is nearly nonexistent, but eighty percent of the given game, film, or song will come through clear and clean.
If you currently have a decent headset, particularly the original Cloud, I wouldn’t repeat the Stinger is necessary-own. However if you’re looking for an excellent value on entry-level hardware, this really is it. It’s an insane bargain when comparing it with other headsets in the same price tier.
At just under $100, Corsair’s Void Wireless is mostly a good wireless headset, but you will encounter some compromises.
Frankly speaking, Corsair doesn’t have any competition in this particular category. Most decent wireless gaming headsets will run you $150 or even more. Corsair’s Void Wireless is priced at a mere $100, which leaves it on its lonesome.
But even making up that vacuum, it’s excellent. Not phenomenal, mind you, but at this particular price you’re obtaining a bargain.
I wasn’t really sure what things to make from the Void’s weird, diamond-shaped ear cups but after some use I’m actually pretty pleased. The Void Wireless sits a little forward in the head, together with the band resting just above your forehead. It will take some becoming accustomed to, but the outcome is less tension in the jaw and more on the back of the pinnacle where it’s less noticeable. I wouldn’t say it’s as comfortable as being the more conventional HyperX Cloud, but without a doubt I really like it over its predecessor, the H2100.
The on-headset controls are fairly intuitive, with a volume rocker at the base of the left ear, plus oversized buttons for power and mute around the side. And it’s got 16.8 million color RGB lighting, if that’s your bag.
The greatest design issue would be that the Void Wireless is heavy. It’s not a problem when sitting up, but when you appear down or check out the headset has an inclination to slide around. I don’t know whether it’s as a result of battery or maybe the metal-augmented construction, but your neck turns into a workout using this headset.
Sound-wise, the Void Wireless still needs some work. It may sound passable, especially while gaming, but throwing on some music sets the Void Wireless’s limitations into stark relief. The reduced-end is muddy and distorted, and the whole range of mid-to-high-end frequencies sounds slick, like you’ve applied a lot of compression.
You are able to adjust the headset’s sound in Corsair’s software, but Corsair’s software package is still a lttle bit unwieldy. A lot better than a year ago, I feel, but still not comparable to Razer, SteelSeries, or Logitech. Also, many folks have reported troubles with firmware updates-not much of a great sign.
“This doesn’t appear to be a very positive review,” you may say. And you’re right, it’s not. The Void Wireless is not an amazing headset, as I said up top. Yet it is the most effective wireless gaming headset under $150, and given just how many wires are attached to my PC at any moment, the benefit of cheap wireless may be worth sacrificing a little bit of sound quality.
Logitech’s G533 doesn’t have quite a similar breadth of options as the G933, but a more restrained design plus a bargain price get this a solid contender for optimum wireless headset.
It’s a difficult call replacing our former mid-tier wireless pick, the Logitech G933, using its sibling-successor the Logitech G533. Like, really tough. The G933 is a wonderful headset, with crisp and well-balanced audio and a few nifty design features (like having the ability to keep the USB dongle inside an earcup).
But I’m still replacing it. Why? Well, aesthetics can be a huge reason. If you want a sign how Logitech’s design language has shifted before year or so, look no further gam1ngheadset the G933 and G533. The G933 was all sharp angles and sci-fi. The G533 however is sleek, professional, restrained. Having a piano-black finish and soft curves, it appears like a headset produced by Audio-Technica or Sennheiser or even a more mainstream audio company-possibly not a “gaming” headset. I enjoy it.
The G533’s design is likewise functional. The microphone isn’t as hidden as I’d like, but that’s the only flaw. The headset is lightweight, durable, and much less vise-grip tight than its predecessor.
Concerning audio fidelity? It’s not quite equal to the G933, nevertheless the differences are minimal. The G533 lacks some oomph, especially at lower volumes, as well as its 7.1 support is subpar. Those are hardly reasons to stay away, though-a lot of people will run the headset loud enough to counteract the headset’s lack of presence, and virtual 7.1 is (for me) pretty much always bad. The G533 is worse compared to the average, although the average remains to be something I choose to protect yourself from everyday.
In any event, the G933 is still being offered and it is an absolutely good choice for some, specifically if you want console support. The G533 is PC-only, whilst the G933 may be attached by 3.5mm cable to other devices. Of course, if you value comfort over audio fidelity, have a look at the SteelSeries Arctis 7 too-one more great choice.
Astro’s new A50 touts a brand new charging station and better controls, but still doesn’t put out of the audio you might expect coming from a $300 pair of headphones.
SteelSeries Siberia 800 Wireless Dolby 7.1 Gaming Headset
After having a new generation of your computer headphone and Siberia 800 released in 2016, I figured we may finally break the tie that’s dominated our splurge headset pick over the past couple of years.
But when again, there’s no clear winner at this $300 price-though Astro certainly made some strides toward edging out SteelSeries.
The brand new A50’s biggest improvement is definitely the battery. The brand new model overcomes a lengthy-running weak spot and packs in 12 to 15 hours of life-enough to help you get through a good long day of gaming. Much better, it features gyroscopes inside the ears that allow it to detect whether you’ve set it up down. It automatically shuts off ten seconds later if so, then turns back and connects in your PC on once you pick it back up. Its base station also functions as a charger, a great combination of function and sweetness.